@article{oai:kansaigaidai.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008018,
 author = {Kaneko, Naoya},
 journal = {The Journal of Intercultural Studies},
 month = {},
 note = {Article, This article deals with a Buddhist-Jainist dispute over perception-theory in ancient India. In this article, I take two persons: Buddhist scholar Śāntarakṣita and Jainist scholar Sumati. The former is well known in ancient Tibet and among modern reserchers of Indian thought. On the other hand, the latter is little known because of the lost of his works. For this reason, Śāntarakṣita's work Tattvasaṃgraha is almost the only source to know Sumati's thought. In the dispute between them, they show quite contrastive theories of perceptual process. In other words: Sumati maintains that the perceptual content becomes clear in a certain period of time, because the object of perception is qualified by qualifier called the universal (sāmānya). Against this, Śāntarakṣita maintains that the perceptual content of individual things at the first stage is the clearest and the universal is a subjective conceptual thing, because it is not experienced by perception. From these standpoints, they develop further argument to defend their doctrines.},
 pages = {61--76},
 title = {THE INDIAN BUDDHIST PERCEPTION-THEORY IN TATTVASAṂGRAHA AND ITS PAÑJIKĀ : SOME CORRECTIONS AND REVISED TRANSLATION OF THE TEXT CHAPTER 17 (2)},
 volume = {42},
 year = {2020}
}